Get Started
Couple looking at financial options for their lawsuit

Lawsuit Funding Explained


Lawsuit funding, also known as legal funding, litigation financing, or pre-settlement funding, is a type of non-recourse advance that plaintiffs can obtain against the anticipated settlement or judgment in their case. In this arrangement, a specialized funding company provides the plaintiff with an upfront cash payment in exchange for a portion of the future settlement or court award.


The key feature that sets lawsuit funding apart is its non-recourse nature. This means that the funding company only gets repaid if the plaintiff wins their case or reaches a favorable settlement. If the case is ultimately lost or the plaintiff does not recover any damages, they owe nothing back to the funding company. This makes lawsuit funding a truly risk-free option for plaintiffs, as they have no personal liability for repaying the advance.


Lawsuit Loan Defined


On the other hand, a lawsuit loan is more akin to a traditional personal loan. In this scenario, the lender provides the plaintiff with an advance on their anticipated settlement or court judgment, but the plaintiff remains obligated to repay the loan regardless of the outcome of their case.


Lawsuit loans function just like any other recourse-based financing, with the plaintiff required to make regular payments to the lender over an agreed-upon repayment period. If the plaintiff loses their case, they are still fully responsible for repaying the loan, plus any accumulated interest and fees. This distinction - the plaintiff's continued liability - is the primary difference between lawsuit loans and lawsuit funding.

Pros and Cons of Each Option


Both lawsuit funding and lawsuit loans can serve as valuable lifelines for plaintiffs facing financial distress during protracted legal battles. However, each option comes with its own unique set of pros and cons that individuals should carefully weigh before making a decision.


Lawsuit Funding Pros:

  • No obligation to repay if the case is lost (non-recourse financing)
  • Can provide funds quickly, often within 24-48 hours
  • Allows plaintiffs to avoid premature settlements driven by financial need
  • Gives plaintiffs more leverage in settlement negotiations

Lawsuit Funding Cons:

  • Funding companies may charge high fees and/or interest rates
  • Plaintiffs receive less of their total settlement/judgment amount

Lawsuit Loan Pros:

  • Potentially lower interest rates than lawsuit funding, depending on the lender
  • Plaintiffs maintain more of their settlement/judgment proceeds
  • Funds can be used for any purpose, not just legal expenses

Lawsuit Loan Cons:

  • Plaintiffs are still obligated to repay the loan regardless of case outcome
  • Missed payments can negatively impact the plaintiff's credit score
  • May require collateral or a creditworthy co-signer to qualify

Choosing the Right Option


When facing financial pressures during a lawsuit, plaintiffs should carefully weigh the unique tradeoffs between lawsuit funding and lawsuit loans. Consulting with a qualified attorney or financial advisor can also be incredibly valuable in ensuring they make the best decision for their individual circumstances.


Ultimately, the choice will depend on the plaintiff's specific needs, the strength of their legal case, their overall financial situation, and their willingness to assume the risks associated with each option. By fully understanding the key differences, plaintiffs can make an informed decision that provides the financial support they require without jeopardizing their long-term financial well-being.